Skip to main content

About your Search

20130201
20130228
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
to us as they do so it was a routine engagement with the press as we normally do when things are made public. >> next. >> brennan stressed the plot was not a threat to u.s. public or air safety because washington had inside control. >> inside control of the plot. that's exactly right. >> okay. so based on that, one would know that we had something inside. is that a fair statement? >> it's -- from that statement, it is known that ied at the time was not a threat to the traveling public. we said there was no active plot at the time. >> would you agree that disclosure was -- resulted in the outing of an asset that shouldn't have been outed. >> absolutely not. >> how can you say that. >> because i -- what i'm saying is that we were explaining to the american public why the ied was not a threat at the time it was in the control of individuals. when we say positive control, inside control, we have at operation either environmentally or any number of ways. it did not reveal classified information and i told those individuals and -- to transcripts available of that conversation. i cannot talk
. >> having used the words of inside control, it isn't much of a leap to determine you had a handle on it. >> it's not much of a leap to know if we said this ied was in fact obtained and it was not a threat at the time, that there was inside control. it's almost a truism. >> having said that, it seems to me that the leak that the justice department is looking for is right here in front of us. you disagree with that. >>> i disagree vee vee helmetly. i talked to the department of justice and i'm a witness in that as many people are. there's witness, subject and target. i'm not a subject or target, i'm a witness. i want to make sure whoever leaked the information to the press that seriously did does erupt operational equities on the part of operational partners. that never should have happened. >> you agree this was a serious flaw in what should have happened. >> it's a serious flaw it got out to the press before the operation was concluded. absolutely. >> and you were. >> and my discussion with those individuals that night, it was already in the press. >> you would agree with me on the day
. is this over the top end of the world stuff if they do getting a little more than unbecoming, and is using emergency works as props to make pint, no a point,w making any attempt at reigning in spending pointless. look at the props and our debt and the three and a half trillion dollar budget from which we're cutting 80 million dollars. ask yourself this. is thi this is the kind of reacn cutting gets you in washington, what happens when we really have to get cutting in washington? today we cut to the chase. expect no cutting at all. >>> welcome, everybody. i'm neil cavuto. they say actions speak louder than words. let's just say the president's action on spending today leave me doubtful about his words on spending any day because mark it down, he has given up those sequestration cuts on which he signed off. what amounted to a back up back bone for washington to come up with automatic cuts if they couldn't agree on at least some cuts is suddenly looking real, and to hear the president tell it, real dangerous as well, but again, ask yourself this. if cutting little more than 1% off the growth
the dow is down a bit. that not go to kill us. your world with neil cavuto captioned by closed captioning services inc. >> here comes the snow. then here comes he snow jobs. fox on top of the flakes and on top of the flakes. before we get to that beastly storm, a look at some plain old, well, bs. >> eight days from now, a tremor will hit the american economies by impacting the people who work in the food safety area of usda. >> terrible consequences to public halve. >> the country less safe and the communities less safe as a result of sequester. >> the air air traffic controllers. >> 750,000 americans will not have jobs. >> now, you would think they way they're talking, the sequestration next week, we're all eating con tam it inned meat next week. i say these cuts go through we'll all be eating mr. ed here. >> what kind of a name is ed for a hours. >> what kind of name is wilbur for man. >> that's -- >> what a bunch of horse you know what. leaving aside all the other cuts, the agriculture department could pursue, if it really has to due really think the first thing they'll butc
methamphetamine and marijuana. but first one of them tried to refill you beau contain torches they want today use. the vapor reached the pilot light in the furnace and kaboom. the other brother was not seriously injured because police arrested him. no word whether the lottery ticket survived the explosion. who gets the money? we've to have doug burns back and ask him. i'm harris faulkner. that's it for "studio b." so glad i could be here for shepard smith. he'll be back here tonight. headlines when you want them, foxnews.com. now neil cavuto. >>> [ sirens ] >> this just in, get ready to freak the heck out. forget meteors from space. the sequestration cuts go through, you'll be lucky to make it to march 2nd. welcome, i'm neil cavuto. lights, camera, calamity. the press on a media blitz to warn we're about to go bust. you might as well stick your head up your rear and pray. pray now. because get ready for hell and soon. get ready for poison meat because we'll have 2,000 fewer food inspection, more dangerous working conditions because we'll have 1200 fewer workplace inspections, get ready for more c
will join us in a bit. i want to put this in perspective. 85 billion in a budget of $3.8 trillion. a debt of 16 plus trillion. this week, warning of a fiscal trap, last week more concern with golf traps. >> playing with mr. president was pretty cool. he's a wonderful person to be around and we won. he's an avid golfer and so am i. so we went out there and we had a great round of golf with ron and jim and it was a good day. >> a good day. but to herman cain, not exactly good optics. what do you think? >> neil, i think that it is an insult to the american people. the main reason the president is playing golf with respect to the sequestration thing, he does not care. he even said in 2011 that it wasn't going to happen. he has enough time with congress being in recess, he goes and plays golf, to play the blame game. to build a public case. neil, we do not have a leader in the white house. we have a politician in the white house who is more concerned about his public image because it has worked in the past. now, let's take this sequestration amount. 2% is what that works out to be. and it is b
as well. neil, the reason? people are saying because refine riz are down. the u.s. says our oil reserves are up. the fact is they're saying there's more necessity for gas around the globe, and that causes prices to spike, and here in california, as you hear a bus backing up to my right, people are not too happy whatsoever at all. they drive in and out of the station we're at. 4.99. you can drive around southern california in the car culture and fine a number of stations already above $5 a gallon. and again, we're in the middle of winter. wait until april comes around and the summer driving season starts and the prices spike then. people are worried we might see $6 a gallon here in california. i. >> neil: adam, thank you very much. even before the cold, it would cost you more to fill your car. wait until you see how much more it could be costing you just to heat your home. phil is on the -- with the latest on the chill pill. reporter: in the northeast if you're heating with heating oil, prices are 91-cents a gallon more than a year ago, this is mainly because of the aftermath of hurrican
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)